Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 3801 - 3820
of 71,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 7:34 am
In the case, Nissan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:23 am
The Supreme Court of the United States will decide in a private session tomorrow whether to grant the petition for certiorari filed by Wal-Mart in Dukes v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:43 am
Godz. 11.00 Coffee break Godz. 11.30 V session ? [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:27 am
The Ontario Court of Appeal, in R v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Nevertheless, where state secrets are not disclosed to a court of law because of these interests, the resulting state of affairs is ‘tantamount to a removal of the court’s jurisdiction by executive ipse dixit’ (i.e. by the executive branch’s own say-so: Devenney v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:33 am
The United States Supreme Court has just granted review of the Google v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:36 pm
On December 2, 2015, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm
Oil States Energy Services LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Nevada v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:43 am
In Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Ministry of Defence v Cartner [2011] EWCA Civ 1516 (08 December 2011) Country Style Foods Ltd v Bouzir [2011] EWCA Civ 1519 (08 December 2011) Cusack v London Borough of Harrow [2011] EWCA Civ 1514 (07 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) MO, & Ors, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2854 (08 December 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Bates, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Macola v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
R, § VI.A.1. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
In the new edition of KRB, we've included the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Brodie v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:29 am
R. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:37 am
HOPKINS and MARY HOPKINS v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:34 am
Northern Oil and Gas v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
