Search for: "State v. South"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 10,939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
South Florida Water Management District, a case involving whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit in order to transfer polluted water between bodies of water. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
In September 2019, the Massachusetts Appeals Court summarized the state law on revenge porn in Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Additional Resources: Schutz v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:06 am
Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 8:54 am
(citing State v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 8:31 am
Lafourche Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:04 am
In Harwood v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 7:05 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am
The United States recently filed a petition for certioriari in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:11 am
San Diego County Bar Tackles Lawyer Friend Requests and the Ex Parte Rule South Dakota S.Ct Recognizes the Obvious: a Happy Birthday Message on Facebook Doesn’t Mean Much — Onnen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
The impact of the Blind SA Constitutional Court judgment on amendments Readers would recall that South Africa’s Constitutional Court had in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition & Others unanimously declared that the Copyright Act was unconstitutional to the extent that it limited the rights of people with visual and print disabilities. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:20 pm
This means that Tasmania has the same representation as does the approximately 25 times greater population of New South Wales. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
See Padilla v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:31 pm
In Cahaly v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Hanson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Hanson v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:43 am
I've posted a good bit on Philip Morris v. [read post]
