Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 42,052
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
" The landmark 1953 case that gave vitality to the "state secrets" privilege was United States v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:45 am
From Monday 9th May – Tuesday 10th May, the Court will assess costs in Secretary of State for Health and others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 44. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
The District Court case in California: Sulitzer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:10 pm
Circuit a few weeks ago or People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 8:06 am
In this essay, I attempt to address those objections, using as a paradigm the “reasonable speed” statute considered in State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Planned Parenthood of Southwest and Central Florida v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 3:00 pm
Next week, the New York Court of Appeals will hear oral argument in Jaramillo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
And that was the week that was. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:47 pm
Gomez specifically notes that “Defendant did not violate Roe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 2:56 pm
Rosenow The following week, on September 18, 2014, the Court handed down a 4-3 decision in Alltel Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
Last week, a federal judge in the District of New Jersey denied Wyndham Hotels and Resorts' motion to dismiss the FTC's complaint alleging Wyndham violated the FTC Act by failing to provide reasonable security for its customers' personal information. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:45 am
Oklahoma v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
As I have noted, Republicans in North Carolina (and Pennsylvania too) have been invoking the theory over the last few weeks to challenge state court rulings that rejected (and replaced) congressional district lines drawn by the state legislatures. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:04 pm
A good new example is Berg v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:42 pm
The Utah Supreme Court also joined in, agreeing that the good faith exception applies for changing law: State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
