Search for: "United Online Inc" Results 3801 - 3820 of 4,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
   Comments may be submitted online via the federal Rulemaking portal, available at https://www.regulations.gov; by mail sent to Docket Clerk, U.S. [read post]
31 May 2019, 12:29 pm by Jonathan Stoler and Daniel Masakayan
These competitions are watched by millions of fans across the globe on TV or online, and by others who attend live esports events. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 12:39 am
The IMO is an agent of the United Nations and represents 152 major maritime nations. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Bill Marler
   Comments may be submitted online via the federal Rulemaking portal, available at https://www.regulations.gov; by mail sent to Docket Clerk, U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 12218-20 Faulkner v LancsLive, 2 Privacy (2019), 14 Confidential sources (2019), No breach – after investigation. 12103-20 Smith v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), No breach – after investigation. 11902-20 Khan v Birminghammail.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation. 10490-20 Devlin v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019, Breach – sanction:… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
A recent trademark dispute between fitness-tech company iFIT inc. and lingerie retailer Victoria Secret shows that any everyday word (here, “SWEAT”) can qualify for trademark protection. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:00 pm by Rob Robinson
January 25, 2024, Update Vendor Voices in eDiscovery: From Mobile Collections and MEDAL to Announcements and Acquisitions ComplexDiscovery Staff Complete Legal’s Acquisition of Frontline Managed Service’s eDiscovery Unit: Setting a Client-Centric Standard in Legal Tech The recent merger of Complete Legal, L2 Services, and Precise Legal, followed by the acquisition of Frontline Managed Service’s eDiscovery unit, highlights a significant shift in the… [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 5:14 am by Rob Robinson
KLDiscovery Enters into Transaction Support Agreement and Exchange Agreement to Reinforce Long-Term Financial Foundation KLDiscovery Inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 3:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
UHG/Change Healthcare Ransomware Attack Background When United Health Group (“UHG”) Subsidiary Change Healthcare announced Blackcat1234 ransomware group took control of and shut down the payment, revenue cycle management and related tools and systems on February 21, 2024, its system lockdown prevented Change Health from even speculating how many individuals’ protected health information was compromised. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 4:49 pm by Bill Marler
He is the publisher of the online news site, Food Safety News and his award winning blog, www.marlerblog.com is avidly read by the food safety and legal communities. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by Robin Shea
United Parcel Serv., Inc., [FN] the Court said that evidence of an employer policy or practice of providing light duty to a large percentage of nonpregnant employees while failing to provide light duty to a large percentage of pregnant workers might establish that the policy or practice significantly burdens pregnant employees. [read post]