Search for: "Warne v. State" Results 3801 - 3820 of 14,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2018, 12:38 pm by Anushka Limaye
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies gave a detailed analysis of oral arguments in Sessions v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm by Rachel Brown, Wenqing Zhao
Xu, a deputy division director with the MSS’s Jiangsu State Security Department, is the first Chinese intelligence officer to be extradited for prosecution in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 10:50 am
The legal framework governing the LAWS seems not to be that clear and state opinions are divided on the topic. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 10:00 am by Jody Simon
The Wikimedia brief warns of dire consequences if the circuit court ruling is allowed to stand, stating that it permits copyright owners to “stifle criticism and undermines established fair use principles that are vital for media commentary. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 5:37 am by Jon L. Gelman
Because we find a duty does indeed lie to such persons in the recognizable and foreseeable area of risk, we answer the certified question, as restated, in the affirmative.Quisenberry v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:01 pm by Ronald Mann
Because the injuries in question occurred at sea, the liability of the manufacturers cannot be determined under the law of any particular state. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting dissent from denial of review by Texas's high court for criminal cases.From today's opinion in Ogle v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]