Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 19,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2020, 2:15 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., including the United States government as intervenor in the case. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 3:06 am
United States Attorney General Jeff Sessions is expected to release a report this week that may urge more federal interdiction against state-level medical marijuana programs – a move that would raise some compelling legal and policy questions. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:37 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court has ruled in People v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:52 am
In Citibank, N.A. v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:07 am
The twenty-week law was therefore unconstitutional under an unbroken stream of Supreme Court authority, beginning with Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
United States (Monetary Damages; Subject Matter Jurisdiction) United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:56 am
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in a recent landmark decision, Lohé Issa Konaté v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 5:00 pm
Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) and United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
Earlier this week, I mentioned as an aside that I appreciated Justice Thomas's call to overrule Griffin v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
It was originally scheduled for November 8.This week the United States Department of Justice and the European Commission cleared the Microsoft-Nokia deal, and the England and Wales High Court entered a UK injunction against various HTC devices including the One mini. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:09 am
The two cases, Sebelius v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
For a copy of the Court of Appeals's decision in Ziegelmeyer v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:16 pm
Next week, in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
