Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2009, 6:12 am
X and Y are, on any view, vulnerable adults. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:16 am
Such claims may be in the form 'X for medical treatment' (first medical use) or 'X for the treatment of Y' (second medical use). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:07 am
Now the study found that 69% of them do, indicating a generational shift in attitudes from Generation X. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:25 am
Is my gen x gen y stuff work? [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
That's an amalgam of two seemingly disparate acronyms; this bleeding edge technology is designed to help those of the "Y Chromosome" set more effectively and pleasantly interact with those who sport the "Double X. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:28 pm
https://genxgenypublications.dabbledb.com/page/genxgenypublications/vdwpvoTH [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:59 pm
Reinvent this, you Boomer running dog lackeys, you Gen-Y teacups. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:37 am
It is logically impossible for economist X and economist Y to inhabit the same universe! [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 7:02 am
Acabamos de firmar un acuerdo de colaboración entre iAbogado y el despacho especializado en nuevas tecnologías X-Novo para ofrecer, a través de nuestra plataforma, diversos servicios de Derecho de las Nuevas Tecnologías. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:31 am
An X-Y chart locates them as two different points. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
En un momento crucial para las Universidades, en que Bolonia llama a la puerta, con exceso de profesores y escasez de alumnos, y con crisis económica de telón de fondo, nada mejor que la reflexión crÃÂtica sobre la Universidad española, donde está y hacia donde va. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 9:55 am
Gen X (and Y) is more visible than ever under this President. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:49 am
Sure, sometimes we may vote for Candidate X even though we prefer Candidate Y because we don't think Y would have the votes, and we prefer X to Z. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:01 pm
David X. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 8:05 am
Since X resumed his place as major of the palace last September, with Y as captain of the palace guard and that weak, fitful, bad-tempered and usable Merovingian in their custody, the outlines of the defeat they mediate have grown plainer. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 12:26 am
The griping entitlement of the Slackoisie, Gen X and Y to the uninitiated, may have hit the wall with the death of guaranteed Biglaw bonuses. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:20 pm
It cannot be true that every single person in category X (say, partner) is irrebuttably indispensable while everyone in category Y (non-equity) is subject to scrutiny. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
There has to be some particular reason why X should be held to have assumed responsibility for protecting Y from Z. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:03 am
If some thing is possible, say event X, we say that X occurs in some possible world. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:42 am
Again, could Y seek damagers against X in the arbitration for the costs incurred in respect of the foreign proceedings; and in respect of any judgment which that court ultimately delivers in favour of X? [read post]
