Search for: "York v York" Results 3801 - 3820 of 52,973
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by James Petrila
The need for something like FISA was made clear as early as 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in the famous Keith Case that electronic collection in domestic security cases fell within the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as set forth in Katz v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum & Vitulli 2023 NY Slip Op 01812Decided on April 5, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department is a legal malpractice case concerning, as do so many other famous legal malpractice cases, real estate in New York. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of 495 Estates v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:18 pm by Elliot Abrams
New York: The Court will consider whether the improper admission of an out-of-court statement by an alternative suspect was so insignificant as to be harmless under Chapman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am by Kaylee A. Sill (US)
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
There is little doubt that Dominion’s suit for damages met and indeed exceeded the standard the Supreme Court established in 1964 in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
Ed Shanahan reports for the New York Times. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
And when that request was denied, an appeal followed.Since any alleged “legal error or tactical miscalculation by trial counsel,” along with any purported failure to “adequately prepare for trial,” was not found to warrant a do-over, the Appellate Term, First Department, left the Civil Court’s determination undisturbed.Looks like that shipping company’s ship ... sailed.# # #Carlo Shipping Intl., Inc. v Doumbia [read post]