Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 3821 - 3840 of 10,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Naccarato (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, 17-CV-24682-JLK), the SEC alleged that in September 2013, California-based attorney Owen H. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:16 am by Jordan Brunner
The United States and South Korea have agreed not to hold joint military exercises during the Olympics, the Wall Street Journal informs us. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Jane Chong
Imagine the president granted a set of pardons to assist a foreign adversary in waging war against the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:13 am
Khaled "Kal" Bassily (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 16-CV-2733 / Apr. 12, 2016), the SEC alleged that  Khaled Bassily, former head of ConvergEx Group's transition management business,  defraudd charities, religious organizations, and retirement funds by charging them substantially higher amounts than disclosed for the execution of trading orders.Without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, Bassily… [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, plaintiff has presented evidence of a “continuing wrong,” which is “deemed to have accrued on the date of the last wrongful act” (Leonhard v United States, 633 F2d 599, 613 [2d Cir. 1980], cert denied 451 US 908 [1981]; Harvey, 34 AD3d at 364). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), which considered whether federal immigration law preempted an Arizona state law designed to add extra state enforcement mechanisms. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]