Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 3821 - 3840 of 4,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
United States The father of a victim of the massacre at Sandy Hook, has won a defamation suit against the authors of a book called Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, purporting a series of false claims. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am by Alyssa Yamamoto
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (IPEG),  ISPs, what's a patent worth, climate change and IP audit mistakes: (StrategicIP), Patent trolls - the pot calling the pot black: (IPEG), Nokia's new music service - sensible DRM? [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:14 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
Beginning in 2011, OUR Walmart’s stated goal was to improve the working conditions of all Walmart employees. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:35 am
During a unit search on July 11, 2007, all of my writing paper wasconfiscated and all of Steve Champion's reference books were taken. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
By now, the United States has had the experience of having a woman of color serve as Vice President—the first time someone who is not white or not a man has held that office. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The sad thing about this book is that it reflects the notion that the dialogue over the intellectual commons is an exclusively United States affair, which is by and large true. [read post]
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
“They are ‘owned by, produced by or for, or . . . under the control of the United States Government. . . . [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(The IP Factor) AIPI endorses Israel Commissioner of Patents for further term of office (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office rules judicial estoppels to prevent post decision amendment (The IP Factor)   Nigeria Nigerian Copyright Commission to stay under Ministry of Justice (Afro-IP)   Serbia Serbia IPO invalidates BULLDOG ENERGY DRINK recognising RED BULL as famous mark (The IP Factor)   South Africa Advertising Standards Authority denies iBurst protection for colour… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(The IP Factor) AIPI endorses Israel Commissioner of Patents for further term of office (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office rules judicial estoppels to prevent post decision amendment (The IP Factor)   Nigeria Nigerian Copyright Commission to stay under Ministry of Justice (Afro-IP)   Serbia Serbia IPO invalidates BULLDOG ENERGY DRINK recognising RED BULL as famous mark (The IP Factor)   South Africa Advertising Standards Authority denies iBurst protection for colour… [read post]