Search for: "Born v. Born" Results 3821 - 3840 of 7,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
 This low threshold, in the context of industrial applicability, was supported by the Supreme Court in HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 where “plausible” was used alongside “educated guess” and “reasonably credible”. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Alessandro Cerri
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something… [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 3:49 am
The Slants (Matal v Tam)According to the GC such criminal activities breach the very values on which the EU is founded, in particular the values of respect for human dignity and freedom as laid down in Article 2 TEUand Articles 2, 3 and 6 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by Peter Margulies
’ But we should not be asking: ‘In what country were you born? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Constitution; and (2) whether Ohio’s refusal to recognize a judgment of adoption of an Ohio-born child issued to a same-sex couple by the courts of a sister state violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:23 am by Susan Brenner
Yvonne also had a child, Emma, who was born in1994. [read post]