Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 4,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 11:45 am
The group, Velvet Revolution, had already made similar complaints to Boards of Professional Responsibility in DC, California, Pennsylvania, Texas, and New York. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:57 am
" The third granted case, Renico v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
” [15] An athlete who resides in Texas and does not pay an income tax will still have to pay at a high rate when they play in California. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:42 pm
Airborne Health, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 3:38 pm
: Microsoft v Lucent (IP Frontline) (IP Frontline) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps McAfee – Motion to transfer venue to Minnesota denied: Deep Nines v McAfee (EDTexweblog.com) Network Solutions – Motion to transfer granted as to California defendants – denied as to new Texas defendants (EDTexweblog.com) Vizio – Federal Circuit to hear oral argument in Vizio appeal 10 December (ITC 337 Law Blog) Volomedia – EEF… [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Ltd v Underworks Ptd. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:45 am
See you in court (5) Update: California courts won't ban homeschooling (3) Update on Mraz v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:04 pm
 In California, a score of 84 did the trick. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
In California, a score of 84 did the trick. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:16 am
Balthaser Online, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:07 pm
And: Four years ago, the Supreme Court faced a similar situation in Roper v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 4:32 am
The case is Choi v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Schmerber v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Likewise, just in the past month the Eastern District of Texas dismissed "[t]he California court's holding in Conte" as "anomalous. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music… [read post]
