Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 5,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2012, 8:35 am
He actually wanted greater pension and health insurance leverage vis-a-vis his police and firefighters, although those unions are specifically exempted from Act 10 reforms. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:34 am
He actually wanted greater pension and health insurance leverage vis-a-vis his police and firefighters, although those unions are specifically exempted from Act 10 reforms. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
[vi] 16 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
Note that the filing of the return does not necessarily mean any actual gift tax is due. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
This also means that it does not define a multiplicity of varieties which necessarily consists of s [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:43 am
"[i] The definition does not include pipelines, which generally convey "hazardous" materials. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
[vi] Id. at ¶2. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:50 am
VI, sec. 2, para. 3; Winberry v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm
Const. amend VI; Art. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm
Many others have written about Kimberlin and what he does to silence bloggers. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
If not, does that pose a risk to U.S. interests? [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
The point of Burger is the expectation of privacy vis-a-vis one's license. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 5:09 am
Those negotiations culminated in 2008 in amendments to MARPOL Annex VI that include the sulfur fuel standards. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:41 am
Going beyond that, the project aims to present the main general provisions through which – in the authors’ view – cooperative law should be formulated to provide cooperatives with a definite and distinct legal identity vis-a-vis other business organizations. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:01 pm
It contained a disclaimer which is referred to as “disclaimer (vi)” in the following passage where the Board examined the allowability of the disclaimer under A 123(2):[3.2] Disclaimer (vi) […] was introduced in response to a novelty objection raised under A 54(2) EPC with respect to document D6. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:05 am
VI. [read post]
30 May 2012, 10:05 am
VI. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:40 am
At the same time, we have noted that any adverse impact on competitive opportunities for imported products vis-à-vis like domestic products that is caused by a technical regulation may potentially be relevant for an assessment of "less favourable treatment". [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:57 am
[vi] Washington H.B. 1634, See also Revised RCW 19.122.110(2)(b) (effective January 1, 2013). [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:51 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia) As this blog's readership grows, so does our clout, Let's use it! [read post]
