Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 93,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am
*State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:00 am
Gomez (SCOTUS 1/21/16) (discussed here), the Supreme Court of the United States held that an unaccepted offer to satisfy the named plaintiff ’s individual claim does not render a putative class action moot. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
United States ruled 9-0 that, based on the text, a Trump-era law making retroactive Obama-era sentencing reductions does not apply to low-level offenders. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:19 pm
Since my previous post on the United States Supreme Court case of Maples v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am
The case is Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB Case C‑466/12, where a group of journalists writing for the the Göteborgs-Posten newspaper’s website sued Retriever Sverige, a commercial indexing service which provides its clients with links to articles published by other websites. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:50 pm
The case is today's Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:20 am
It does [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeIn Holt v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:08 pm
The Supreme Court decided Hemphill v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 10:44 am
Board of Education of Ewing, Lyng v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:58 pm
We hold that it does not. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
Carter and Minnesota v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:28 am
By Stevie Phillips In State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
Twitter First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:21 am
(See Bosh v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:30 pm
So the patents are, for now, not completely immune to the attack as stated by Allergan's press release (although a different deal and parties could take a different position which could make the sovereign immunity v federal court position a bit murkier). [read post]
