Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 3821 - 3840 of 4,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2010, 11:19 am by Ray Dowd
 Spain put the art collection into a "foundation" and tried to insulate it from claims from an American Jew named Claude Cassirer whose grandmother Lilly had been spoliated by the Nazis in the widely-reported case Cassirer v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 1:04 am
They were among 8 men who'd traveled by submarine from their native Germany and landed months earlier on the U.S. coast. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
– A.D.A. (1709 Blog) Conference systems and informed users: Shenzhen Taiden Industrial Co Ltd v OHIM (Class 99) Finland Conflict between trademark and name of a rock band – ‘Hurriganes’ (Class 46) France The Tour De France – an inspiring anti-climax (Afro-IP) Germany German Federal Patent Court: ALLFAcolor v ALPHA (Class 46) A brief update on Paul – psychic octopus and trade marks (Class 46) Regional Court of Cologne (LG Köln) had… [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
The Attorney General pressed that point in an amicus brief for the United States filed in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
214/09 P, Anheuser-Busch Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Bud? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:58 pm by Embassy Law
The case is Mortimer Off Shore Services Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
guest post, prompted by her work in a pending looted-art case; her prior, related posts are here and here)What judges think of their function and task undoubtedly informs their understanding of their power or jurisdiction.In a March 3d order denying reconsideration of her January 6th dismissal of the heirs' lawsuit in the Nazi-looted-art case of Grosz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:29 am by Russ Bensing
  Marion V., who teaches German and Geography, refuses to say if she is actually afraid of rabbits. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 2:15 pm
Thus, the jury was properly instructed to analyze the alleged restraints under the rule of reason, and their finding that the Federations failed to prove the relevant market defeated the Sec. 1 claim.The decision is Deutscher Tennis Bund v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
Hot off the presses and straight from the source, I have an advanced copy of the International Court of Justice preliminary ruling concerning Italy’s counterclaims in the Jurisdiction Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]