Search for: "Grant v. Grant"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 94,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
MHL Tek, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Stark in M/A- COM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:01 am
ZN and Others (Afghanistan) v Entry Clearance Officer Supreme Court “Family members who applied to enter the United Kingdom to join a sponsor who had been granted asylum did not have to meet the maintenance and accommodation requirements imposed by the ordinary rules relating to applications by family members, even if the sponsor had, by then, obtained British citizenship. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:14 am
Ryanair Holdings Ltd v Office of Fair Trading and another; [2011] EWCA Civ 1579; [2011] WLR (D) 392 “The Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules granted a power to suspend the running of time, with regard to an investigation by the OFT, as a matter of urgency and in order to protect the public interest.” WLR Daily, 21st December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:50 am
Introduction I blogged on February 16, 2011, about the Supreme Court‘s grant of certiorari in Camreta v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
HOLLEY, SR. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
Regina (NB (Algeria)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 1050; [2012] WLR (D) 233 “The Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to grant an claimant, whose claim for judicial review of a removal order had been rejected by Upper Tribunal, a stay of his removal until his application for permission to appeal had been considered by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:24 am
This opinion will not be published. 2010AP1175 Sands v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:29 am
Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd and anr [2009] EWCA Civ 579; [2009] WLR (D) 187 “A party, under licence from the Crown to search for, bore and obtain oil, which drilled and used pipelines to extract the oil from land without the grant of permission by the owner of the paper title in [...] [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:21 am
KOCH, ET AL. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 6:27 am
The post SDS TITLE, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:56 am
Regina (Health and Safety Executive) v Wolverhampton City Council: [2012] UKSC 34; [2012] WLR (D) 212 “A local planning authority, when considering under section 97 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 whether to revoke a planning permission it had previously granted, was entitled to have regard to the cost of the compensation it would have to pay to the developer out of public funds should it decide to revoke. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm
For those in DC wanting to see the historic argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 7:03 am
The recent oral argument in Thompson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
In Munoz v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:00 am
Trutanich v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:44 am
Transport for London (London Underground Ltd) v Spirerose Ltd (in administration) [2009] UKHL 44; [2009] WLR (D) 273 “Where permission for the redevelopment of the claimant's land would on the balance of probability have been granted as at the valuation date, the Lands Tribunal had not been entitled to value the land on the basis that [...] [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:46 pm
T-Mobile Northeast, LLC v Township of West Deptford Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2014 WL 4098140 (NJ Sup. 8/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/appellate-division-unpublished/2014/a4188-12.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 10:11 am
Sure, as it turns out, the Governor does't actually have the power to reverse parole grants for people convicted of conspiracy to commit murder, as opposed to actual murder. [read post]
