Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 4,789
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 11:51 am
C. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Also important is Section 512(c)(c), referred to as the “safe harbor” provision. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:25 pm
We are grateful to Professor Burkhard Hess (Heidelberg) for the following remarks on the German preliminary reference in case C- 491/10 PPU (Andrea Aguirre Pelz): Mutual Recognition and Fundamental Rights Case C-491/10PPU – Andrea Aguirre Pelz An important preliminary reference has recently reached the ECJ’s dockets: In the case C-491/10PPU the Higher Regional Court of Celle referred to Luxemburg the following questions: Where the judgment to be… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
§ 251(1)(C)(1) (Su [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
The Tryons refused to take part in the family report process (where a psychologist or social worker interviews the family to assess what is in the best interests of the child) without having their lawyer present. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
The fact that Sir Anthony May rejected this line of reasoning and accepted adult health as a “consequential benefit” should come as no surprise, presumably because the Article 36 “human health” requirement cannot be parsed down into child health and adult health, as the Claimants were contending. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Direct response, back then, was the ugly step-child to the general advertising world. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support.... [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Foster.Foster, James C. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm
Broadly sketched, she claimed that as a seven year old child in 1941 she witnessed the Nazis seize her parents. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Jason C. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:48 pm
”“Imagine getting a B in that class as opposed to a C,” Miyake said. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
” (on ECJ, 14.1.2010 – C-233/08 – Milan Kyrian ./. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:53 pm
G.L. c. 208, § 31. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
§ 204.11(c)(6). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:39 am
Another interesting point is the comparison in the expected standard of welfare when comparing animals to children: is it anomalous that one can physically discipline a child but cannot use an electric collar on a pet? [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
(c) Adverse effects on relationships with others as a result of matters dealt with in the litigation (see eg In Re BBC, [19], per Lord Hope). [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:53 pm
(c) Definitions. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:32 am
[Says the IPKat, someone probably sent their child to university for three years so that he could learn to write like that-- and they say that creativity is dead. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
I have no reason to doubt that they are typical examples of the type of cases referred to the Interested Party in respected of specified offences at the less serious end of the spectrum. [read post]
