Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 3821 - 3840
of 18,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm
ShareTuesday’s argument in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
”; quoting In re CNX Gas Corp. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 2:13 pm
Note to our Right on Crime friends: We need to see Bernie Kerik v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am
The Justices asked for evidence of original understanding in the re-argument to Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 11:42 am
The Court also remanded People v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
Justice Kennedy remanded the case to the lower federal court with instruction for that court to mandate the state court to re-offer the plea bargain, or to leave the defendant's conviction and sentence undisturbed. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Bollinger; Anthony Kennedy did the honors in Fisher v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:28 am
Following Lord Neuberger's comments in Zipher v Markem [2009] EWCA Civ 44 (paragraphs 19 and 23-24), the judge held that she could re-examine the scope of the undertaking(s) given orally, and that the ambiguity should be resolved in favour of the person who would be bound by the undertaking i.e. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm
The Court denied the motion for reconsideration in In re Mortimore Estate. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 10:02 pm
The dissenters cited Justice Scalia’s 5-4 majority opinion in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:01 am
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 1:14 pm
In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, 554 F. 3d 300, 315-16 (CA2 2009). [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:00 am
Agriculture Law in Québec: Income StabilizationFinancière agricole du Québec v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:55 am
WARREN WHISENHUNT, No. 13-0926 Per Curiam IN RE STEVEN LIPSKY, No. 13-0928 Opinion of the Court SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:58 am
” At PrawfsBlawg (via How Appealing), Richard Re explains that in Ramos v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:17 am
It could even, as in Jones and Jardines, assemble a coalition of justices that combines those who emphasize the importance of the positive law/trespass principle and those who emphasize the importance of Katz v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
”) In re Activision Blizzard, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:14 pm
If you’re interested in a more thorough analysis, you can see my old congressional testimony on the subject — or, better yet, review Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:56 pm
In re Cornerstone Therapeutics Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:22 pm
"To me, Justice Nares need say no more. [read post]
