Search for: "JONES v. STATE." Results 3821 - 3840 of 6,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2007, 3:39 am
Jones, 336 F.3d 245, 248 (CA3 2003) (suspect kept a 9-millimeter Luger under his pillow while he slept); United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:11 pm
President Bill Clinton and Paula Jones: Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, filed suit against then-President Clinton in 1994, alleging incidents of harassment and inappropriate behavior. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
United States Reuters reports the US District Court for the District of Montana blocked a ban on TikTok that was set to take effect in Montana 1 Jan. 2024. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:17 pm by Todd Ruger
” The Supreme Court, in January’s U.S. v Jones decision, ruled that a GPS tracking device attached to a car for weeks without a warrant violates the Fourth Amendment rights to be free of searches. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
” That problem came to a head a couple of weeks ago in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Superior Court (1984) 161 CA 3d 151, 167-168 (pdf), family members Jones v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm by David Smith
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
Oklahoma, 17-6891, and Jones v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
The Conglomerate’s forum on Jones v. [read post]