Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 3821 - 3840 of 5,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
The key points from Burnip would be that the shortfall was discriminatory because a) their HB was based on one room less than their objective needs, and b) – breaking new ground - drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”.It is also worth noting Henderson J’s… [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm by Giles Peaker
As regards (b), the decision letter was dated 21 December 2018, a Friday. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Krull, 480 U.S. at 368 (O’Connor, J., dissenting) (observing that, “under [the Court’s] decision today, no effective remedy is to be provided in the very case in which the statute at issue was held unconstitutional”). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:19 am by Dan Hepburn
The matter was brought before the courts when the tenant decided to exercise its option to renew the lease and the landlord refused to allow the renewal. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:33 am by Lindsay A. Heller
  However, the recent unpublished (non-precedential) decision of In the Matter of the Estate of James J. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
Co., 252 AD2d 537, 538; see also Matter of Prudential Prop. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:13 am by emagraken
The defence is then required to respond to the plaintiff’s case, including leading evidence on any matters on which it carries the burden. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 4:10 am by SHG
Update: Apparently, the Ben & Jerry’s response came from its parent, Unilever, and the B&J board does not agree. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:25 am by Tim Zubizarreta
The report is redacted according to the Attorney General’s stated framework of Grand Jury, Harm to Ongoing Matter, Investigative Technique and Personal Privacy. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:16 am by Giles Peaker
The primary decision maker on this matter under the Regulations is the debt advisor, not the court. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 1:40 am by INFORRM
Were it otherwise, the press would be unable to play its vital role of ‘public watchdog’ (Observer and Guardian v United Kingdom (1992) 14 EHRR 153, [59(b)]). [read post]