Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 22,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2014, 5:50 am
Four-fifths rule rejected. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
But is there One Ring to rule them all? [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:39 pm
[1] See e.g., https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/lexicon/why-does-corporate-governance-matter-a-look-back-at-history/ [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm
These regulations help to clarify what qualifies as energy property that is eligible for the ITC (Section 1.48-9), provide additional ITC-specific rules surrounding the increased credit amount as a result of satisfying the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements enacted by the Inflation Reduction Act (Section 1.48-13), and adopt various other rules relating to the ITC (Section 1.48-14). [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 4:13 pm
In the past the Criminal Court have frequently applied the State Constitution, in both civil and criminal matters, to define a broader scope of protection than that accorded by the Federal Constitution in cases concerning individual rights and liberties. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
" It treats ramifications of a more vigorous use of rule by presidential decree that appeared to be the first efforts of the new government in India in the assertion of regulatory power. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Now with only six justices sitting on the bench, under the applicable rules, whenever the Pennsylvania Supreme Court comes down with a 3-3 split decision on any matters before it, the lower appellate court's ruling will be allowed to stand. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:53 am
In its recent decision in the Matter of Kempisty v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:36 am
This is a very clear rule… which is why there are some exceptions to it! [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
(Note: Hawaii’s court rules were amended this year to recognize such a defense). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 11:23 am
Thus, it affirmed the trial court ruling. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
Yesterday I argued that there isn’t anything unconstitutional about the California rule: either it’s a state rule of contract definition that merits deference for federal-law purposes; or it’s merely a super-protective rule of California constitutional law, which California courts are entitled to adopt as a matter of their own constitution. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:10 am
In fact, even those that have implemented the directive have adopted differing approaches. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
However, the domestic content rules are a matter of provincial legislation. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:54 pm
So I suggest we adopt the concept of judicial “primacy” in constitutional enforcement. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:47 pm
Infosys presumably adopted a full-court press by mounting a campaign in the U.S. [read post]
31 May 2009, 7:44 pm
And for the other "98 cents" worth, visit the California Condo Guru where you will find free articles on enforcement, FYIs on fines, hearings, and adoption requirements for new rules and rule modifications, and best of all, incredibly useful (and affordable) Primers. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:01 pm
Some of the judges expressed concern that adopting a rigid rule might eliminate patents on software, but the PTO responded that most software implemented on computers would still be patentable because they transformed the computer and the software was tied to a machine. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
The rule was created by the Supreme Court out of whole cloth in the twentieth century and the tail end of the nineteenth, a century after Amendment was adopted. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Adopt procedures to comply with HIPAA requirements and maintain documentation of all of your protocols. [read post]
