Search for: "Michael Denis"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 10,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 9:18 am
Riley, Uma Chandrasekaran, and Michael D. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Democrats who believe—rightly in my view—that the Republican-controlled Senate acted without justification by denying Judge Merrick Garland a hearing despite the fact that he was nominated almost a year before the end of President Obama’s second term may choose to filibuster the Gorsuch nomination on the ground that this seat was effectively stolen.In addition, although no reasonable person doubts that Judge Gorsuch has excellent professional credentials (as does Judge… [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
On New Year’s Eve, Justice Sonia Sotomayor granted a temporary injunction against the enforcement of the contraceptive coverage requirements of the regulations implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly known as Obamacare). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
On Tuesday 20 and Wednesday 21 February 2024, the High Court heard an appeal against the 2023 decision to deny Julian Assange permission to appeal his extradition order. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
., 11/10/2021)Here's a good example of successfully investigating, denying and litigating a rate evasion/garaging fraud case. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:00 pm
His subsequent appeal was denied.25. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 12:50 pm
WikiLeaks denies any communication with Stone. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:12 pm
The operative document on security clearance determinations, including appeal rights afforded to individuals whose security clearances are denied or revoked, is Executive Order 12968 (as amended). [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm
Ruling Judge Cueto ruled that the Florida Exclusivity Doctrine was unconstitutional on August 13, 2014.���_ One week later, he denied a motion for rehearing filed by the Attorney General's office. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
In re Michael, 699 F.3d 305 (3rd Cir. 2012). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:42 am
Critics who dismiss responsible electoral mapping generally takes one of two lines of argument: Either they urge the nation to “let a computer do it” based on traditional criteria such as geographic compactness (see here for a review of many such attempts), or, more rarely, they deny that redistricting makes much of a difference – dismissing the disproportionately partisan outcomes yielded by many redistricting maps as inescapable side effects of the vagaries of elections… [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:05 am
The post Better Data, Better Results: Comparing the Gap Between the Copyright Review and Heritage Study on the Music Industry’s Policy Proposals appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:28 am
by Michael Kun The California wage-hour epidemic has entered its second decade. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:15 am
” No one denies that infringing activity takes place, whether in Canada or elsewhere. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:42 am
The post The Case Against the Bell Coalition’s Website Blocking Plan, Part 9: Why it Violates Canadian Net Neutrality Rules appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Yesterday’s decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is the latest twist in Michael Flynn’s prosecution for lying to federal agents about his contacts with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:22 am
Scott denied that the decision involved content regulation, instead suggesting it was about standards. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:32 am
The court denied the motion for reconsideration. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:20 am
The post The Case Against the Bell Coalition’s Website Blocking Plan, Part 14: Failure To Further the Telecommunications Act Policy Objectives appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:50 am
A few weeks after that, Scott appeared before the Senate committee and Bill C-11’s chief supporter in Senate, Senator Denis Dawson, asked almost an identical question to clarify the clarification: Mr. [read post]