Search for: "People v. Render" Results 3821 - 3840 of 4,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 7:42 am by Mario Herman
An added advantage that India offers is a large population of well educated young people familiar with technology and software. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:31 pm by Mark Bennett
Some lawyer working on something entirely different might at some point need to know about Schmoe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:05 am
For those of you who may not have been following  Bloxham v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
(International Transport Workers’ Federation v Viking Line ABP). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:06 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:45 am by David Keane
” On the decision to render the Indian Directive Principles non-justiciable, A.E. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 5:59 am by Daniel Spiegel
According to a report compiled by an advocacy group, Pregnancy Justice, in the year after Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:04 am by Karel Frielink
Press release In today’s Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Delfi AS v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The section could have been interpreted consistently with these principles, but for the addition at a very late stage of the Bill through Parliament of section 1(2), which has rendered the proper construction of section 1(1) less obvious. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
Attorney for Cultivation of Marijuana Cases in Tampa, Hillsborough CountyThe Attorneys at the Sammis Law Firm are members of the NORML Legal Committee dedicated to fighting for the reform of marijuana laws in Florida. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1990 case of Rutan v. [read post]