Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 6:13 pm
Franklin Mint Co. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:42 pm
Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 17 (1990); Letter Carriers v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:50 pm
Bullock v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:10 am
AG Capital Funding Partners, LP v State Street Bank and Trust Co, 11 NY3d 146, 866 NYS2d 578, 896 NE2d 91 (2008). [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 7:02 am
The case was filed with co-counsel in California---Alex Wheeler and The R. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 12:35 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
(ETS), raised capital to grow his coin-operated payphone business by using a network of independent insurance agents to sell payphones to investors throughout the United States for $5,000 to $7,000 per phone. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 8:03 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision in City of Arlington, Texas v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm
So now that the Goldwater Institute has cornered the well-heeled and well-funded niche that purports to defend the economic freedoms of those they deem oppressed from those they deem accursed, Bolick pines for more deregulation of legal services while at the same time declaring how happy he is “to live in a state that recognizes that more choices lead to greater access to legal services. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
Trust Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am
It stands at the centre of the bosses v workers, capital v labour, rich v poor divide and is frequently pressed into service by those who have a political agenda on one side or the other. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
Claims can be brought under federal common law for public nuisance only when the courts are 'compelled to consider federal questions which cannot be answered from federal statutes alone.' [citing: City of Milwaukee v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 9:01 pm
Trust Co., N.A. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
Acadia Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
