Search for: "STEVEN YORK"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 6,934
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 9:28 pm
” The sharply worded dissent, on the other hand, noted that: Because Steven received significant value in exchange for the payment of $6.25 million to Laura, his retention of the Madoff account and subsequent losses render this case no different than the legion of cases denying a spouse's request to open up a divorce settlement where the final value of an asset was not what the parties believed at the time of the divorce. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:22 pm
Grodin, a former portfolio manager at Steven Cohen's SAC Capital Advisors LP, declined to comment. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
’ JUSTICE STEVENS’ analysis, in our view, should have been controlling in Bowersand should control here. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 11:58 pm
Justice Stevens Has a Bone to Pick With N.Y. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
He admitted leaking Trump’s confidential tax information to the New York Times in 2019 and then replicated his work the next year, filtering the tax returns and financial data of thousands of wealthy Americans to ProPublica. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
” Seth Stern at the Huffington Post and Tom Scocca on his eponymous Slate blog offer their reactions to retired Justice John Paul Stevens’s essay on the death penalty in the New York Review of Books (covered in Monday’s round-up). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
As speculation continues that Justice Stevens will retire at the Term’s conclusion, Chris Rovzar of the New York Magazine discusses a recent Vanity Fair poll, in which fifty-five percent of Americans indicated that they would support an openly gay Supreme Court justice. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
The problem, as the New York Times reported in its recent story "Exams of Injured Workers Fuel Mistrust," is exemplified by a quote from one IME, Dr. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
” Coverage of Benisek comes from Steven Shepard at Politico and Steven Mazie for The Economist. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am
Kirk Johnson of the New York Times, Ray Sanchez of ABC News, Jennifer Dobner of the Christian Science Monitor, and the AP (via USA Today) all have coverage. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:34 pm
Nissen's position on Avandia, we refer you to these two items: 1) A February 23, 2010 New York Times (NYT) story, "A Face-Off on the Safety of a Drug for Diabetes", by Gardiner Harris, again; and,2) This recent medical journal article from European Heart Journal, "The rise and fall of rosiglitazone", by Steven E. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that during oral argument in this week’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
Additional coverage of the argument comes from Richard Wolf at USA Today, who also highlights some of the justices’ questions here; Bill Mears at Fox News; Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal; Nina Totenberg at NPR; Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow for The Washington Post; Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller; Adam Liptak for The New York Times; Lawrence Hurley at Reuters; Mark Sherman at the Associated Press; Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog;… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
And discussing the decision in Arizona Free Enterprise Club, Steven D. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am
Yesterday the New York Times ran an editorial listing what it regards as the most “feasible” legislative proposals to curb corporate campaign spending in the wake of the decision. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:21 am
” Stevens cited a 1936 opinion from Justice Louis Brandeis on the same question, State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:47 pm
., joined as to all but Part IV, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined as to Part IV. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:53 pm
The lone dissenter, Justice Stevens, insisted that whatever conclusions were to be drawn from the video should be left to a jury to determine. [read post]
