Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 21,151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2020, 5:43 pm
The Supreme Court will hear the libel appeal in Serafin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 3:03 pm
Cohen v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am
It aims to establish trade mark liability in certain circumstances for online marketplaces which do not crack down on the sale of counterfeit products on their platforms.On the TTABlog, there was commentary on the standard applied by the USPTO when confronted with a sign in another language (in this case, whether MONFRÈRE FASHION is liable to be confused with MY BROTHER).PatentsThe FPC Review commented on how to interpret expressions stating a purpose in patent claim… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
There is a long history of pirate websites locating themselves outside of the United States but marketing themselves to U.S. users in a deceptive manner that makes it difficult for consumers, including both consumers and brands, to distinguish an illegitimate site from a legitimate one. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:44 pm
Strauss v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
See Sher v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Some state laws on this may also have to be addressed.Why are 11 of 26 biosimilars approved not actively marketed in the US? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:50 am
Platkin decided Flink v Smith, 2020 NY Slip Op 50305(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Feb. 7, 2020], involving a dispute between former law partners following the collapse of their PLLC known as Flink Smith Law (FSL). [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 7:33 pm
To court provided this explanation on this recent motion, in Karasik v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
Judge William Fletcher (Oh, that crazy Ninth).Allen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 12:17 pm
United States decision by the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 4:57 pm
Federal and State LawsIn the United States, the United States Arbitration Act (Pub.L. 68–401, 43 Stat. 883, enacted February 12, 1925) (FAA) governs international arbitrations. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
That case, Stoyas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:04 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
TheInfluence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law” (forthcoming Modern LawReview)]This paper presented a really fascinating look at the "explosion" of copyright jurisprudence at the CJEU. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am
” Id. at 9 (quoting Walden v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 5:15 pm
Sales Test Under Revenue & Taxation Code section 23101(b)(2), if a taxpayer has sales in California for the applicable tax year that exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 25% of the taxpayer’s total sales, the taxpayer is deemed to be “doing business” in California. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
That case, Stoyas v. [read post]
