Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 4,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2010, 8:45 am
Justice Thomas had dissented in January when the Court, in another election case (Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 4:15 pm
” Arguing on behalf of the United States in support of the petitioner, Assistant to the Solicitor General Pratik Shah faced questions from Justice Scalia, who asked about the potential tension between the government’s position in this case and the case’s implications for other fee-shifting statutes that similarly lack an “prevailing party” standard. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
My last post laid the foundations for a discussion of Orin Kerr’s latest law review article, “Applying the Fourth Amendment to the Internet: A General Approach” (2010) 62 Stan.L.Rev. 1005. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
If the Second Amendment is incorporated against the states does that mean that Alaskans have fewer Second Amendment rights because the "right [that] was understood at the time" that Alaska was admitted was presumably the understanding in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:30 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:09 pm
State) and national origin (e.g., Korematsu v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
Blackmun and Antonin Scalia did in their dueling separate opinions in a 1992 abortion case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:54 pm
About a week later, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in City of Ontario v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:05 pm
For example, the Court in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in the case of Jerman v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Lyrissa mentioned yesterday's SCOTUS decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
But also because I was jarred by the juxtaposition of his dissent in Johnson with his decision to join the 8-1 majority in yesterday's ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:51 pm
A Service from the ABA Criminal Justice Section, http://www.abanet.org/crimjust United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm
Bilski I wrote previously about my uneasiness with the United States Supreme Court’s apparent unfamiliarity with current technology. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:12 pm
United States, 517 U.S. 748, 769 (1996). [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm
The Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”) eliminated the writ of habeas corpus for any “alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
The next body of cases involves less traditional alignments among the Justices – generally, the Court’s left (Stevens, Ginsburg, and Souter) and right (Scalia and Thomas) wings joining together to form a five-Justice majority. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
