Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 3,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
In Merlin Partners LP v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Shareholders were represented by co-lead counsel firms Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll. 2.) [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Weekly D355bCriminal law -- Jurors -- Peremptory challenge -- Gender discrimination -- State's explanation that it had a bad feeling about juror was not a valid gender-neutral explanation for strike of last male on panel -- Trial court erred in upholding strike based upon fact that state had struck an equal number of male and female jurors -- It is improper for court to consider overall makeup of jurors that have been seated in determining sufficiency of gender-neutral reason… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot to issue second mortgages for the buyers to go towards the properties on the guise of being later repaid, "when in fact [defendants] and the buyers had an agreement that neither the seller second mortgage or note would be repaid in any part. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot to issue second mortgages for the buyers to go towards the properties on the guise of being later repaid, "when in fact [defendants] and the buyers had an agreement that neither the seller second mortgage or note would be repaid in any part. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The FTC notes that a relevant product market is properly drawn if a “single firm . . . seeking to maximize profits controlled all sellers of a set of products or services and likely would undertake a small but significant and non-transitory increase in price or other worsening of terms” (SSNIPT). [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:04 pm
This is in a state of flux; FTC asks whether the consumer would be surprised to find out the truth. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
However, the explanatory notes to the Act indicate that the new defence is intended to reflect the common law as set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [2012] UKSC 11, in which Lord Mance stated that it would seldom be in the public interest “…to publish material which has not been the subject of responsible journalistic enquiry and consideration. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
. ~~~ The State: New York The Case: In re: Ferrel L. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:01 pm
These browsewrap agreements sometimes state that mere use of the website constitutes assent to the terms and conditions. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Stutzman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, for example, recently ruled in the Epic v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:31 am
Is it the business lock, stock and barrel or does the seller intend on keeping any of the assets. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am
Note how broadly the court’s principle sweeps: there are a number of regulations of specific fields that would appear to be jeopardized by this standard, including restrictions on the kinds of tie-in benefits that sellers of real estate can offer, see, e.g., Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm
Now under the leadership of Commissioner Jenny Yang, a former plaintiff’s class action lawyer for the Washington D.C. firm of Cohen, Milstein, Sellers & Toll, PLLC, the EEOC published on July 7, 2016 a ten-year a review of its efforts to improve its systemic discrimination litigation program and objectives. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:58 am
Based on his own experience in the industry, the affiant stated that Tucker’s services were considered to be retail functions. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Mobileye, Inc. v. [read post]
