Search for: "State v Smith"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 11,004
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm
Jenner v Minogue: the battle of the Kylies In 2015, Kylie Jenner applied to trade mark the name KYLIE in the United States (and later in other countries, including Australia) for advertising and endorsement services, and entertainment services. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
The individual certainly cannot travel to the United States and travel elsewhere in the world risks detention and possible extradition to the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:39 am
Nancy Urizar: Supreme Court Of The United States To Hear Oral Arguments In Patent Exhaustion Case Andy Lucas & Robyn Chatwood: Intellectual Property Rights In A Virtual World Deanna Okun: US Must Bolster Fight With China Over Intellectual Property Rights Matthew Humphries: Sony Patent Wants Every Gadget To Double As A Wireless Charger Evan Engstrom: In Apple v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Kornreich, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Ret); Of Counsel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer and Nelson, P.A. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The petitioner in Smith v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
Smith, 186 N.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
Smith had already concluded, in Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 5:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled (2-1) in Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 5:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled (2-1) in Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:12 pm
Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 6:09 pm
Her retaliation claim, however, failed (Poe-Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
Smith, Harvard Law School: Why private law/IP? [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
Nevertheless, having considered the chain of title and following Edwards Lifesciences v Cook Biotech [2009] EWHC 1340 (Pat), in which the court held that to make a valid claim for priority as successor in title it is necessary to be a successor in title at the time of filing the application, and KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), in which the court held that “successor in title” includes a person who was a recipient of the beneficial interest in… [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
Berkeley, California: A Vibrant Past I’m Ed Smith, a personal injury attorney in Berkeley. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:32 am
Although the court granted summary judgment against her religious discrimination claim, it found fact issues as to whether her employer regarded her as disabled under the ADA as a result of a sprained left wrist and as to whether it could have reasonably accommodated that perceived disability (Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
The Secretary of State, Karen Bradley, has written to the company [pdf] indicating that she is “minded” to issue a European Intervention Notice. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:06 pm
Ed. 2d 257 (2005) and Gunn v. [read post]
