Search for: "State v. Battle" Results 3821 - 3840 of 7,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2017, 4:30 pm
Our court battles are part of that equation — part of it — but far from the only thing to resist that agenda. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:50 am by Guest
This time, for my book cover on McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
The case involved a drawn-out and costly battle over control of a family corporation. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
As a country, we have been a constant state of battle ever since.The first major challenge to Roe, following a rightward shift on the Court during the Reagan and Bush I administrations, came in 1992. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Executive Power After United States v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:55 pm
" (link)Swanson is now waging a legal battle against Sunrise for possession of the placenta. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
 All words, including the Constitution are weapons in some battle trying to accomplish some program. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:04 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
At the time, the parties stated their belief that the receiver had “about” $7.9 million in his account. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:04 am by Peter Mahler
Hart’s decision in Berger v Friedman, Short Form Order, Index No. 702322/15 [Sup Ct Queens County Oct. 27, 2015], centers on a wholesale distributor of electrical parts and equipment founded in 1945 by the grandparents of the three sibling litigants who each acquired a one-third interest from their parents in 1993. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Most recent decision: Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd v EUIPO, Case T-112/13 (December 2016)One can be forgiven for thinking that Nestle and Cadbury are always in court fighting over the Nestle’s intellectual property rights to the shape of the iconic Kit Kat chocolate bar, as it seems that the battle is written about almost every day. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
    Swap the non-distinctive words and add a house mark: not enough to avoid conflictWEALTHSMART v UBS SMARTWEALTH O/094/18 UK opposition (February 2018)For those involved in brand clearance, this is an illustration of the state of the Thomson Life principle in action before the UKIPO. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 11:07 am by Erin Miller
  That was a question that was left open in the Virginia Military Institute case [United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
Cole of Manatt Phelps Phillips sent word of a Manatt client's recent victory in CKE Restaurant v. [read post]