Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 3821 - 3840 of 21,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm by Alexander Volberding
Generally, an employee does not need to take such leave if another suitable individual—such as a co-parent, co-guardian, or the usual child care provider—is available to provide the care the employee’s child needs. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:45 pm by Anthony Zaller
To take Paid Sick Leave for a qualifying COVID-19 related reason under § 826.20(a)(1)(v) or Expanded Family and Medical Leave, an Employee must additionally provide: the name of the Son or Daughter being cared for; the name of the School, Place of Care, or Child Care Provider that has closed or become unavailable; and a representation that no other suitable person will be caring for the Son or Daughter during the period for which the Employee takes Paid Sick Leave or Expanded… [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lady Hale stated that the chances of a successful outcome in the present case were reasonable. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
  Businesses with greater than 500 employees and businesses for which the SBA Size Standards are stated in terms of annual receipts (without regard for the number of employee), may be eligible for a PPP loan if they qualify as a “small business concern” under existing law. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 7:05 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Double jeopardy — Separate offenses This interlocutory appeal arises from a pending prosecution of Lionel Obrian Lee, appellant, in the Circuit Court for Charles County, on charges of child sexual abuse and third degree sexual offenses. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 6:28 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 2000) (best interests of the child are a compelling state interest justifying infringement on a mother's constitutional right to travel), review denied (Minn. [read post]