Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 3821 - 3840 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2010, 11:00 pm by Peter A. Mahler
  Instead, as I wrote some years ago in a NY State Bar Ass'n Journal article, the case law has developed incrementally and without discernable pattern, based on the peculiar facts and equities of each case. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:17 am
The court gave no reason, but there had been vocal opposition to the proposal from the State Bar Association and county bars. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
I have no direct knowledge, but I’m guessing there will be an appeal based on the fact that Dr [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
He statedI believe this directive to be an unlawful order, as it is in direct conflict with my personal religious convictions, as well as to be conscience shocking. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:13 pm by Ilya Somin
In June, the Supreme Court refused to consider the Trump administration's appeal of a lower-court defeat in the California "sanctuary state" case. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Jeralyn
You can read the facts of the Swordfish scheme in this court opinion, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am by azatty
The panel I moderated that day in April 2008 had panelists: Barbara Rodriguez Mundell, Presiding Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Maurice Portley, Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Pendleton Gaines, Judge, Superior Court for Maricopa County Dan McAuliffe, State Bar President Ed Novak, State Bar President-Elect That’s a great group of folks to sit around and talk about anything. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:00 pm by Jamie Markham
A classic example is a condition requiring that a person be arrested on his or her first violation of a particular condition, like a positive drug screen (sometimes with the additional requirement of a particular bond—even though the court of appeals has said anticipatory bonds are to be avoided, State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:00 pm by Jamie Markham
A classic example is a condition requiring that a person be arrested on his or her first violation of a particular condition, like a positive drug screen (sometimes with the additional requirement of a particular bond—even though the court of appeals has said anticipatory bonds are to be avoided, State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix Chambers
” On appeal, Lord Hope stated in AXA [2011] UKSC 46 at para 52: “52 As for the appellants’  common law case, I would hold, in agreement with the judges in the Inner House, that Acts of the Scottish Parliament [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Long before enactment of the BCL, New York’s highest court held in Darcy v Brooklyn & N.Y. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 8:04 am by The Health Law Firm
Holder, JR., et al., No. 12-5072 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]