Search for: "State v. E. E. B."
Results 3821 - 3840
of 10,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:07 pm
United States, the Court declared the identically worded residual clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, Section 924(e)(2)(B), unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Mudge, Jaclyn E. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
§924(e)(2)(B), was unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
(b) On January 27, 2017, to implement this policy, I issued Executive Order 13769 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Board of Appeal overturned this decision and found that the shape of the KitKat bar was not precluded from registration by Article 7(1)(e)(i) and (ii) EU Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
Introduction B. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 5:14 pm
H.S.P. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:03 pm
Introduction B. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:06 pm
McCowan, Claire E. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:22 pm
State, supra.The court goes on to explain that [b]ut although Frierson's testimony on this point was improper, we conclude that this testimony did not prejudice the fairness of Kim's trial. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am
En efecto, el Secretario de Justicia mediante una opinión, 14-35 B, solicitada por el Consejo, determinó que la Ley 82 había sido derogada tácitamente por la Ley 148 de 1999. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
In the particular case at hand, s73(2)(b) and (3) means that copyright is [was] not infringed "if and to the extent that the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is re-transmitted by cable and forms part of a qualifying service".The broadcasters appealed Arnold J's decision. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
Introduction B. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
