Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 3821 - 3840 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm by Viking
I’m not convinced Daubert (read United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 2:25 am
It was further stated that all use of the mark EXXON made by the subsidiary would constitute use of the mark by EMC. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 4:19 am
Tam, the Board struck down the "disparagement" provision and in Ianco v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Prestonettes, 264 U.S. 359 (1924) and Champion Spark Plug Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:16 pm by Shawn R. Dominy, Attorney at Law
The post on May 3, 2010 explained that defendants in Ohio O.V.I. cases do not have the ability to challenge the general reliability of breath testing machines at trial due to the holding in State v. [read post]