Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 8,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2016, 6:43 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed a victory to the State of Texas in Texas v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am
Supreme Court devastated the strengths of the Voting Rights Act in the Supreme Court case of Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 10:35 am
Supreme Court decision in Muldrow v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am
For decades, universities have avoided the type of outright quota the court held unconstitutional in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:45 pm
Recognizing this interest, in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 6:20 am
(A different federal civil rights statute would protect a black shareholder from being ousted due to his race, but that statute does not apply to gender based contractual decisions). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
The court rejected that argument, saying that, while the Supreme Court ruling (in Crawford v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court upheld the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), in Haaland v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm
One of WA’s racing stewards, Barbara Scott, has been awarded $140,0 [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
And many state offenses as well. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
The opinion they joined (in another 5-4 decision with just this lineup) in Iqbal v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:36 am
On May 24, 2010, in Lewis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
Both sides apparently knew a lawsuit was coming, and Albritton wanted to win the race to the courthouse; so he planned to file ESN v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
In Grutter, a divided court concluded that race-sensitive college admissions programs were permitted if they were narrowly tailored and considered race as one among many factors in the admissions process. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
Yes, in Illinois In People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:12 am
"That basic proportionality argument did not persuade the state Supreme Court, when it was one of a number of arguments made on appeal in State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Acknowledging that IXL Learning had won the race to the courthouse and that it had jurisdiction, the federal court still declined to hear the case because, as it pointed out, all the issues and defenses could be fully litigated in the state court action, which was more appropriate for state court claims. [read post]
25 Oct 2024, 10:50 am
However, in Diamond v. [read post]
