Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 14,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
The challenge is that the constitutional amendment process under Article V is too rigid. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:31 pm
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
Censors should be independent, not just of the state, but of other interest groups, such as the industry itself, and yes, the child protection sector. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 5:08 pm
In last week's Widdison v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 7:30 am
Often, however, state regulation of professions is intermediated by a self-regulatory entity, typically a licensing board. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:56 pm
Defendant then moved to suppress any statement attributed to her, the results of any chemical analysis of her breath, and all other evidence allegedly obtained from her; and, challenged the constitutionality of the checkpoint stop on the ground that the New York State Police failed to follow their own self-established, written guidelines. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
During a subsequent interview, E.L. stated that Nash persuaded her to take the pictures of herself but Nash denies that persuaded E.L. to take the pictures.U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:46 pm
A split panel of the Sixth Circuit today in Davie v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am
Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:13 am
People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 11:43 am
In Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Consider three cases decided earlier this year.In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:51 pm
This week, I’m posting (and combining using the Snyder v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
But like conventional constitutionalism, societal constitutionalism seeks the comfort of equilibrium and stasis as the basic operating premises of self-constituting governance systems. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:36 am
Miller v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:42 am
Hall v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:29 am
State v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
An example is given of a situation in which it might be not clear which of the reasons given by the Examining Division in its communications might be essential to the decision to refuse, and it is stated that in that situation a fully reasoned decision should be issued instead (see C-V, 15.3 "Issuing a self-contained decision").2.2 In the present case, the applicant submi [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
” “It is not for the State authorities to question this self-determination,” it said. [read post]