Search for: "State v. South" Results 3821 - 3840 of 11,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by Kiera Flynn
  The United States recently filed a petition for certioriari in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
  Other states exempt anything "permitted" by the relevant regulatory body (Arkansas, Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming). [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
  The new rule announced in Hurst v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hobby Lobby, 67 South Carolina Law Review 73-97 (2015).Emilia Justyna Powell, Islamic Law States and the Authority of the International Court of Justice: Territorial Sovereignty and Diplomatic Immunity, 79 Law & Contemporary Problems 209-236 (2016).Evan C. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:03 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
(They had a head start last month, when the Court heard re-arguments in an OT2008 case, Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Susan I. Nelson
Alabama still can’t bar them from enrolling, since the Supreme Court declared in Plyler v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm by WIMS
Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota have aspirational goals; the rest have mandates. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 1:06 am
NSW supports option (iii): it suggests that the grounds for automatic disqualification in section 206B of the Corporations Act 2001 be expanded to cover convictions under certain New South Wales provisions regarding criminal organisations and criminal groups. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:00 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
As I reported in my article posted on January 2018, in South Coast British Columbia Transportation Authority v. [read post]