Search for: "State v. Weeks"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 42,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
And that was the week that was. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:13 pm
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 1:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:04 pm
A good new example is Berg v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
As I have noted, Republicans in North Carolina (and Pennsylvania too) have been invoking the theory over the last few weeks to challenge state court rulings that rejected (and replaced) congressional district lines drawn by the state legislatures. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:45 am
Oklahoma v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:42 pm
The Utah Supreme Court also joined in, agreeing that the good faith exception applies for changing law: State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 7:37 am
In what appears to be the first response by a state legislature to last week's Supreme Court decision upholding the partial-birth abortion ban, North Dakota has passed a bill making abortion illegal if and when the Supreme Court overrules Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 5:56 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:29 pm
Last week the petitioners in City of Ontario v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:16 pm
A few weeks ago, Bob Lawless called the Supreme Court’s decision in Schwab v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
Last week, in Danforth v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 5:37 am
In Avila v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am
Coverage and commentary continue to focus on next week’s oral arguments in Evenwel v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 5:40 am
See United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Yesterday’s second grant, in Lozman v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 1:39 pm
At one point, the Court adopted a solution whereby it would announce a new rule in one case but then not apply that rule to cases pending on direct review in which the relevant events (typically a state-court conviction) occurred before the law-changing decision.24 But in Harper v. [read post]
