Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico" Results 3821 - 3840 of 4,080
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Jun. 27, 2008), the New Mexico Supreme Court refused to enforce a class action ban in an arbitration clause in a consumer contract: We hold that, in the context of small consumer claims that would be prohibitively costly to bring on an individual basis, contractual prohibitions on class relief are contrary to New Mexico's fundamental public policy of encouraging the resolution of small consumer claims and are therefore unenforceable in this… [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 12:31 pm
Medellin's lawyers are still hoping the US Supreme Court will issue a stay of execution that would give the US Congress time to pass a new law that can force individual states such as Texas to abide by ICJ decisions. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 9:37 am
Mexico, which has no death penalty, initially sued the United States in the World Court in 2003. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:01 pm
Medellin’s lawyers have asked Justice Antonin Scalia, as Circuit Justice for the area that includes Texas, to postpone his execution until the Supreme Court can act on new appeals by his counsel. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Quarterman, No. 06-10872 Denial of a habeas corpus petition alleging that a trial judge was required to recuse himself is affirmed where the state appellate court's decision denying a new trial was not contrary to, and did not involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, and therefore did not meet the structural error test requiring automatic reversal.. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:35 am
Mooney is relying on 1991 New Mexico federal district court decision that held limiting peyote use to recognized tribe members is a free exercise and equal protection violation. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:27 pm
That led to the  World Court’s July 16 order that the executions of those five be put off while that tribunal considers Mexico’s new claim. ** On June 17, U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 pm
Mexico has now renewed its challenge in the international court; Mr. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 7:30 am
District Court in New Mexico, took up the same issue and reached the contrary result. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:29 pm
The international court's ruling can't be enforced, and the Supreme Court has upheld the state's authority to proceed. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
The top appellate courts of most states (including, e.g., Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina) use the same terminology. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:25 am
Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that since Congress failed to provide a method to implement the treaty, Texas does not have to abide by the treaty. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
As discussed in more depth in II.C., infra, Gomez rejected the federal approach and reaffirmed the continued viability of the time-honored totality of the circumstances analysis in interpreting the reasonableness requirements for warrantless searches under our New Mexico Constitution. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:59 am
  "The New Mexico Supreme Court held that a legal malpractice action need not be brought as a compulsory counterclaim to an action brought by the law firm assserting a charging lien against the former client. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
The US systematically denied such access to many foreign nationals now on death rows throughout the US, and the interplay between the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and US Supreme Court has given rise to ongoing drama in a series of decisions in both courts: Breard (Paraguay), LaGrand (Germany), Sanchez-Llamas (Mexico and Honduras), and most recently, Medellin v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:42 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court held that a legal malpractice action need not be brought as a compulsory counterclaim to an action brought by the law firm assserting a charging lien against the former client. [read post]