Search for: "US v. George" Results 3821 - 3840 of 6,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2013, 5:16 am by David Oscar Markus
., writing for the majority in the case, Clapper v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:44 am by Ben
(Southern District Court of Texas Case No. 4:14-cv-01094).US Law firm Dunlap, Grubb and Weaver, apparently pioneers of BitTorrent "copyright troll" cases, have thrown in the towel against a counterclaim brought against them by an alleged pirate, and have been ordered by Judge George O’Toole  to pay nearly $40,000 in damages and costs. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ryan Scoville
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:58 am by Ben
(Southern District Court of Texas Case No. 4:14-cv-01094).US Law firm Dunlap, Grubb and Weaver, apparently pioneers of BitTorrent "copyright troll" cases, have thrown in the towel against a counterclaim brought against them by an alleged pirate, and have been ordered by Judge George O’Toole  to pay nearly $40,000 in damages and costs. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Assuming that's true, one would want to know whether it's a response to a shift in attitudes or mostly a litigation-avoidance strategy in response to Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The LSE Media Law Blog have an article examining the impact of more stringent data protection laws in Europe and the US on researchers. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Jensen, 21-210: Whether a woman’s statement that if she died, her husband should be considered a suspect, is (after her death) “testimonial” and thus barred under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause George v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric GoldmanTrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]