Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 10,389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:06 pm
While the judgment in Independent Newspapers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:14 pm
For example, in 2009 the Court held such a special session, to re-argue Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
The Market Development Agreement explicitly stated that the parties must execute a separate franchise agreement for each unit. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
In United States EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
United States, one of the court’s many immigration cases this term. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Cover Letter In a one-page letter to Mark Rumold of EFF, Rodney Patton, Senior Counsel in the Civil Division, explains that the accompanying files represent “the first batch of documents” in response to EFF’s FOIA request seeking as-of-yet-undisclosed FISC or FISC-R orders and opinions. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, 15, died in 2010 as he stood on Mexican soil by a border officer who fired his gun while on United States soil in Texas. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes extolled the idea that freedom of speech in the First Amendment is based upon a marketplace of ideas. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:30 am
Salim v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:12 am
Washington; United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
The Board is directed to decide the case on the record before it, and that duty may not be delegated to another body.Conclusion: Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found that VAGISAN is not likely to cause confusion with opposer's mark VAGISIL.Bona Fide Intent to Use: Applicant had not advertised or sold its products in the United States, nor did it have a written marketing plan for the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
As the Solicitor General stressed in his brief, it is issued “in the name of the United States” and is transmitted by the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
In Matal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
