Search for: "United States v. Minor"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 6,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
United States, the court resolved an issue of keen interest to a limited niche of immigrants. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
Court] or branch in this state having jurisdiction in matters relating to the affairs of decedents. (9) “Descendant” of an individual means all of his [or her] descendants of all generations, with the relationship of parent and child at each generation being determined by the definition of child and parent contained in this [code].(10) “Devise,” when used as a noun means a testamentary disposition of real or personal property and, when used as a verb,… [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
Recently, six well-respected former federal judges wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, asking the Senate to "establish an improved process for the consideration of judicial nominations by the United States Senate. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 10:17 am
There was much argument around the claim because the claim just stated the name of the enantiomer, just as some claims merely state the name of the virus or gene or protein. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:18 am
United States, 518 U.S. 81, 113 (1996). [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm
United States, 503 U.S. 540, 549 (1992), holds that entrapment must be decided by the factfinder under the usual "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" standard, and therefore, arguably not in a pre-trial motion. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
" Here's the key language from the article:In the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
Fisher then petitioned to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, and the petition remains on the Court’s current docket. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:16 am
The first three paragraphs explain the scope of the decision in Perry v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Coleman Jr. became the first black person to serve as a law clerk at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:02 pm
Koh's upcoming FTC v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
