Search for: "United States v. Warne" Results 3821 - 3840 of 5,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2025, 9:06 pm by Harvey L. Reiter
Rather, they are illogically based on whether the United States has a trade deficit with the targeted nation. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 6:54 am by Chris Castle
  In the SEC’s Report of Investigation concerning The DAO, the Commission warned that virtual tokens or coins sold in ICOs may be securities, and those who offer and sell securities in the United States must comply with the federal securities laws. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:13 am
As stated by General Counsel for Pernod Ricard Ian FitzSimons following the Third Circuit's decision, "We are determined to continue to fight for fair competition in the United States market where ownership of the ‘Havana Club' trademar [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the one Supreme Court case that construes Section 4, Perry v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
Doar, which was filed on April 10, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:38 am by Theodore Ruger
 In certain localities in the United States, parental objections to vaccination have resulted in a high proportion of children forgoing immunization. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am by Ryan McKeen
Every day, 1000 people in the United States require emergency room care for dog bites. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 3:03 pm by John J. Malm
Malm contended that the vehicle manufacturer withheld important safety features such as dynamic stability control and traction control from a vehicle sold in the United States in order to place revenue over consumer safety. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am by Ryan McKeen
Every day, 1000 people in the United States require emergency room care for dog bites. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]