Search for: "V-lawyer"
Results 3821 - 3840
of 74,072
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
A couple of weeks ago, a three-judge panel of the United States Circuit Court (for the non-lawyers: the highest Federal courts except for the Supreme Court) decided the case of SEC v Scoville, which in effect held that the SEC has enforcement powers against alleged securities frauds which are primarily extra-territorial. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Paul Luvera provides a good "cost v. benefits" sample cross examination. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
The decision in Flamer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:38 am
When last we checked, Molski/Frankovich were appealing a federal judge's finding in Molski v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:59 am
The style of the case is Lynn v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 am
Friday, the day after the New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:13 pm
The decision, K.D. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 1:51 pm
The new Supreme Court Case ruling, Bruker v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:46 am
For noncompete and trade secret lawyers in the healthcare industry, the recent Michigan Court of Appeals case of Isidore Steiner, DPM v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Peach v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Plaintiffs' lawyers have seen drug (and medical device) injury victims take punch after punch. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
Plaintiffs' lawyers have seen drug (and medical device) injury victims take punch after punch. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:54 am
Garner v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:48 pm
Warner Chappell v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 7:20 pm
That case, June Medical Services v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:17 am
Doe v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:19 am
Ray v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:03 am
Firemark - Los Angeles Entertainment Lawyers - Theatre, Film, TV & New Media [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 6:37 am
In view of the fact that many universities, and probably many ISP's, will soon be facing "John Doe" cases in which the RIAA improperly joins unrelated "John Doe" defendants, we thought this an appropriate juncture to remind lawyers of the Order in federal court in Austin, Texas, in Fonovisa v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:39 am
Neil, and re-affirmed in Strother v. 3464920 Canada Inc. [read post]
