Search for: "Wall v. State" Results 3821 - 3840 of 6,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2025, 6:49 am by Paul Clement
In that context, Ed’s amazing institutional memory was on full display, as was his dedication to getting the United States on the right side of the “v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:17 am by Eric Turkewitz
A few of my prior postings on the subject as we put this issue to bed for awhile: Kaye v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
McBeth, Much Ado About Nothing Much: Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Virginia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
Not only does the state have among the highest default rates in the country, its legal system, unlike many other states with devastated housing markets, requires judges to sign off on foreclosures. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:32 am by Marissa Miller
  In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes discusses amicus briefs filed on both sides in American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Scott Calvert report that “[t]he Supreme Court is facing a sensitive choice on whether to intervene in a partisan battle over Pennsylvania’s congressional map,” noting that “[t]he state court based its ruling on the Pennsylvania Constitution, a move that would normally leave the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:47 am by William Carleton
By contrast, minimum wage laws have a remedial purpose of protecting against “‘the evils and dangers resulting from wages too low to buy the bare necessities of life and from long hours of work injurious to health,’” United States v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:00 am
This is the same Republican governor who filed his own brief in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:17 am by Conor McEvily
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky argues that the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
Heller last year applies against city and state governments. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that the decision “culminated a yearslong campaign by state governments and big-box stores determined to close a loophole they argued was draining state treasuries and disadvantaging brick-and-mortar shops,” “underscor[ing] that Supreme Court cases don’t always arise by happenstance. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
The liberal justices, by contrast, have contended that the establishment clause, in the words of Thomas Jefferson, creates a wall between church and state. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 4:04 pm by Josh Blackman
United States, each of the separate opinions contended that the 16th Amendment (ratified in 1913) "overruled" Pollock v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]