Search for: "v. "
Results 3821 - 3840
of 493,652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2020, 12:51 pm
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Msrcus Smith) Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics UK Ltd (t/a Mylan) and another [2020] EWHC 1362 (Pat) (3 June 2020) This was an application by Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:05 am
The post LANCE BENNETT v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:29 am
The post DEBORAH HRUSKO v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
R v Leeks [2009] WLR (D) 220 “The failure to endorse an order amending an indictment would amount to a fundamental error if the court had failed positively to exercise its discretion to make such an order. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm
Criminal procedure — Reversible error — Jury instruction A jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County found appellant Daquan Odemns guilty of (1) use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, for which he was sentenced to 20 years in prison with all but five years suspended, (2) voluntary […] The post DAQUAN ODEMNS v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:15 pm
Author SimonDes Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Philip Morris Products, SA and another v RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc and another [2021] EWHC 537 (Pat) (9 March 2021)This was an action for revocation of European Patent (UK) 3 398 460 B1 ("460") and European Patent (UK) 3 491 944 B1("944") and a counterclaim for infringement by the products [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 11:23 am
Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, the court found appellant guilty of the following … Read the opinion The post ISAAC SMITH v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:31 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Atnold) Allergan, Inc and another v Aspire Pharma Ltd [2019] EWHC 1085 (Pat) (3 May 2019) Allergan Inc is the proprietor of European patent EP1753434 for an enhanced bimatoprost ophthalmic solution which its English subsidiary, Allergan Ltd. exploits by marketing a product containing 0.1 mg/ml (0.01%) bimatoprost for ophthalmic [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 5:53 pm
Massey (Child) v Dinamo Productions Ltd [2012] EWPCC 27 (13 June 2012) was an unusual case in that the claimant was a minor when the claim began. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 7:05 am
The post DOUGLASS DORSEY v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:01 am
The court sentenced Scarboro to […] The post DOMINICK SCARBORO v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:04 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0085, 2009 MT 285, CHAD MALCOLM and JESSICA MALCOLM, Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF TYLER MALCOLM, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
R v Blythe; [2008] WLR (D) 109 “Engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child and causing a child to watch a sexual act were not serious specified sexual offences for the purposes of the provisions relating to dangerous offenders if the person committing the offence was under 18. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:42 am
Read the opinion The post DAOIN FINCH v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:59 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Daniel Alexander QC) Reaux-Savonte v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2021] EWHC 78 (Ch) (22 Jan 2021)This was an appeal by the inventor, Corey Kaizen Reaux-Savonte, against Mr Huw Jones's decision of 19 May 2020 to uphold the examiner's objection to Mr Reaux-Savonte's [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 1:03 pm
The post KEON GRAY v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:58 am
An altercation ensued, and afterward Appellant — as shown by security […] The post ZANEL SANTANA v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:50 am
Read the opinion The post FELICIA LOCKETT v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:42 am
The post KENYETTA RILEY v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 12:11 pm
The post TROY WILLIAMS v. [read post]
