Search for: "BAKER v. BAKER" Results 3841 - 3860 of 4,845
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
December 29, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:54 pm by SOIssues
General Conway today filed a Petition for Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court asking that the Court review the decision in the case of Baker V. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by Marvin Ammori
(Some scholars have demonstrated how media ownership and media access cases inform First Amendment theory, like Jack, Ed Baker, Yochai Benkler, Monroe Price, and Mark Tushnet.) [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm by NL
It makes a distinct contrast and counterpoint to R (Garbet) v Circle 33 Housing Trust and another [2009] EWHC 3153 (Admin) [our note here]. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Between $50 million and $6 billion may be owed to musicians and artists in Canada (Ars Technica) Chet Baker has sued the major record labels for copyright : Chet Baker v Sony BMG Music, EMI Music, Universal and Warner Music (IPblog) Ottawa record store owner pleads guilty to copyright infringement (Michael Geist) Search engine on ACTA – future Canadian copyright policy (Michael Geist) Canada dragging its feet on open data initiatives (Michael Geist)   China… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 2:09 am
New York - New York federal court finds that a computer used to communicate regularly via the internet is a "protected computer" within the meaning of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act Baker & McKenzie "...in the case of Dedalus Foundation v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:21 am
Suvannavejh APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT Land Use and Planning Roads' De-Mapping Reversed; Village Arbitrarily Found Roads 'Useless', Failed SEQRA 'Hard Look' Baker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The New York Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Baker v Village of Elmsford has unanimously held that the Village of Elmsford may not demap and discontinue portions of Vreeland Avenue and River Street unless the Village Board determines the streets are useless and it takes a hard look at the proposed action under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). [read post]