Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 3841 - 3860
of 191,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2010, 9:02 am
Two such interesting petitions have been filed recently: No. 09-920, Simmons v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
As mentioned by Current Awareness, The Times reports today that the Court of Appeal has upheld the decision in S v S [2008] EWHC 519 (Fam), under the headline: "Ex-wife wins new home and £50,000 a year maintenance - for her horses". [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 11:17 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
The case of Oettmeier v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:25 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 1:35 am
Such views have been shattered by the ICJ, most recently (but not exclusively) in Germany v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 10:44 am
The plaintiff in Hicks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:02 am
” WLR Daily, 22nd February 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:56 am
Football Dataco Ltd and others v Sportradar GmbH and another [2011] EWCA Civ 330; [2011] WLR (D) 113 “There was no good arguable case of copyright infringement under article 3 of Directive 96/9/EC such as to establish that the English court had jurisdiction for the purposes of article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 where, even though the collection of data might involve some intellectual creation, what was alleged to have been copied was mere data on any reasonable… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:47 am
” WLR Daily, 7th October 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
Regina (Oakes) v Secretary of State for Justice and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1169; [2010] WLR(D) 267 “The different wording of the tests to be applied when considering the suitability for automatic release of a prisoner who had been recalled to prison for breaching the terms of his licence, under ss 255A(5) and 255C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (as inserted by section 29(2) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008) was deliberate. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:07 am
The dissemination of such information which had been rewritten by the manufacturer and which could only be explained by an advertising purpose was prohibited. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
” WLR Daily, 22nd March 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
California v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
The I.V. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am
The Court however reiterated that a Member State which had granted or sought to be allowed to grant aid under one of the exceptions provided for in the Treaty rules had a duty to cooperate with the Commission in the proceeding in which it took part, pursuant to which it must in particular provided all the information necessary to enable the Commission to verify that the conditions for the derogation sought were fulfilled (Case C‑364/90 Italy v Commission [1993]; Joined Cases… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:10 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in City of Ontario v. [read post]
