Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 3841 - 3860 of 10,148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by SHG
  Not that it was some long-haired hippie throw-back to the Warren Court, but that there was a long tradition of the top court refusing to trot in lock-step with the United States Supreme Court when it came to finding novel excuses to ignore the Bill of Rights, or the local flavor, Article I, § 12 of the New York Constitution. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  The initiative defines “corporation” as “every corporation organized under the laws of this state, or any other state of the United States, or the District of Columbia, or under an act of the Congress of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:47 am by Miriam Seifter
” The United States distinguishes the early cases Knick relies on. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
 Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
California’s so-called “Gig Worker Bill,” Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), goes into effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
For publication opinions today (2): In Tony Billings v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause, and patent case Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
In short, it is now black-letter law in the United States that personal information can only be collected for disclosed and contextually relevant purposes. [read post]
8 May 2015, 10:41 am by Kirk Jenkins
” This was particularly true, as the United States Supreme Court has recognized, when the obligation at issue was purely financial. [read post]