Search for: "Day v. Texas" Results 3841 - 3860 of 7,742
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am by Tara Hofbauer
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
If the plan fails to comply with claims and appeals procedures or other ERISA notification requirements, parties named or functioning as the plan administrator for this purpose also could face penalties of up to $125 per violation per day in the case of enforcement actions brought by participants and beneficiaries or $1025 per violation per day in the case of actions brought by the DOL, plus attorneys’ fees and other co [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Douglas Smith looks at Evenwel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Burwell admonishments against transparently political litigation, one would expect no departure from those rules, if and when Texas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
One of the issues I discussed was the partial enforcement rule - in other words, how courts handle problems of overbroad covenants in enforcement actions.Interestingly, the day before my presentation, the Seventh Circuit issued its opinion in Turnell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Their IIED and negligent hiring, supervision, training, and retention claims failed, however (Arredondo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Frank Perkins Hixon, Jr.Case number: 14-cv-00158 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case filed: February 20, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 20, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-46 In the Matter of Larry C. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Court will not hear an appeal of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision which reversed the lower court’s ruling that the State of Texas had violated the Endangered Species Act in its administration of the state water permitting program which allegedly denied adequate amounts of fresh water at the Aransas, Texas Whooping Crane preserve. [read post]